Purchase-of-service contracting with voluntary organisations for social services in Aotearoa New Zealand is examined, in the context of international trends and as a part of the long run historical evolution of funding ‘technologies’. Gaps between the promise and the reality of contracting are examined, including some inherent contradictions. It is argued that it is even more crucial under a contracting regime for voluntary organisations to have a sharp appreciation of ‘what makes a voluntary organisation’ in general, and of their own vision, mission and values in particular – to resist pressures to remake voluntary organisations in [another’s] image’. This leads to the identification of a number of possible strategies for coping with the ‘bear hug’ of government funding, especially under themes of: accountability and stewardship; choice and responsiveness; and, planning and coordination.
- Citation: Nowland-Foreman, G., (1997). "Can Voluntary Organisations Survive the Bear Hug of Government Funding Under a Contracting Regime? - A View from Aotearoa New Zealand" in Third Sector Review, Vol.3, No.1, 3-39.
- Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives CC BY-NC-ND
- Creator: Garth Nowland-Foreman
- Language: English
- Publisher: Third Sector Review
- Year: 2000-01-01
Get a copy of the report
I agree to use the research in according to the terms of copyright and Creative Commons Licence. For details of Creative Commons licenses visit - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/